The Big Story 

California state lawmakers have ramped up efforts to regulate AI in their latest session, putting the Golden State on a collision course with a Republican effort to impose a national ban on such policies.

© Tayfun Coskun, Anadolu via Getty Images

As the AI race heats up, President Trump and GOP lawmakers have sought to eliminate regulations they argue could stifle innovation, while states forge ahead with attempts to place guardrails on the technology. 

But California sits in a unique position. As the home of Silicon Valley and the center of the AI boom, it could play an outsized role in defining the future of AI regulation — both inside and outside its borders. 

“We dominate in artificial intelligence. We have no peers,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said Wednesday. 

“As a consequence of having so much leadership residing in such a concentrated place, California, we have a sense of responsibility and accountability to lead, so we support risk-taking, but not recklessness,” he added.  

The California Legislature passed several AI bills in the session that ended in mid-September.  

Most closely watched is S.B. 53, legislation that would require developers of large frontier models to publish frameworks detailing how they assess and mitigate catastrophic risks. It is currently awaiting the governor’s signature. 

“Because California is such a large state, any AI regulations that it enacts could serve as a potential de facto national standard,” said Andrew Lokay, a senior research analyst at Beacon Policy Advisors. 

“Companies could decide to simplify compliance by applying California’s rules to their operations beyond the Golden State,” he continued. 

Washington, D.C., is taking notice.

Sriram Krishnan, a White House senior policy adviser for AI, argued last week that they “don’t want California to set the rules for AI across the country.”

Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) acknowledged his home state “continues to be the center of breathtaking innovation worldwide” but called into question whether it should be the one to regulate AI. 

“The notion that this is the right body to regulate the most powerful technology in human history, whose workings are actually largely beyond the understanding even of the technology’s creators, is a fairly fantastical notion,” he said at a hearing last week. 

“I do think the risk that California is going to drive AI policy for the entire country is a very real one, and I think that a national framework that seeks to stop that from happening is needed and appropriate,” Kiley added. 

Check out the full report at TheHill.com.

Welcome to The Hill’s Technology newsletter, I’m Julia Shapero — tracking the latest moves from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley.

Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here.

Essential Reads 

How policy will be impacting the tech sector now and in the future:

Google asks Supreme Court to block Play Store injunction in Epic Games case

Top Republican on House China panel seeks briefing over TikTok deal

Instagram design still makes it unsafe for teens: Report

Amazon reaches $2.5 billion settlement with FTC over ‘deceptive’ Prime practices: Who is eligible for a payout?

The Refresh 

News we’ve flagged from the intersection of tech and other topics:

In Other News 

Branch out with other reads on The Hill:

1 in 5 regularly get news from TikTok: Analysis

A growing number of Americans are getting their news from TikTok, according to analysis from the Pew Research Center. Pew reported Thursday that a fifth of U.S. adults “regularly” turn to the social media platform for news content and development on current events, representing an increase of 17 percentage points from 2020. This trend is particularly true among young Americans, Pew found, noting 43 percent of adults …

Op-eds in The Hill

Opinions related to tech submitted to The Hill: