House Democrats not convinced Iran nuclear capabilities wiped
A House briefing from Trump administration officials on last weekend’s strikes against Iranian nuclear sites has done little to mollify the concerns of Democrats, who say they were presented little evidence that the attacks will prevent Tehran from producing nuclear weapons.
Skeptical Democrats had gone into the briefing with two pressing questions: Did Iran pose an imminent threat to Americans, thereby justifying President Trump’s move to launch the strikes without congressional approval? And did the attacks “obliterate” Iran’s capacity to make nuclear weapons, as Trump has claimed?
Leaving the closed-door gathering, Democrats said they got satisfactory answers to neither question.
“I would say that that particular briefing left me with more concerns and a true lack of clarity on how we are defining the mission and the success of it,” said Rep. Katherine Clark (Mass.), the Democratic whip.
Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.), a former nuclear physicist, said the U.S. strikes likely knocked out Iran’s centrifuges and other infrastructure required to enrich uranium in the future. But there’s no evidence, he said, that the attacks destroyed Iran’s existing stockpiles of enriched uranium. If those are intact, he warned, Iran could still produce weapons with the strength of a Hiroshima bomb in “a very small breakout time.”
“The goal of this mission, from the start, was to secure or destroy that material,” he said. “That’s where they’re hiding the ball. And that’s what we have to keep our eyes on.”
Friday’s House briefing came six days after Trump ordered strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites in an effort to dismantle Tehran’s ability to produce nuclear weapons. The briefing was conducted by top administration officials — including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Secretary of State Marco Rubio — who had also briefed Senate lawmakers a day earlier.
Trump has repeatedly said the mission was an unqualified success, “obliterating” Iran’s nuclear capacity and setting the program back by years. And the president’s GOP allies in the Capitol echoed that message after the briefing.
“It is clear, everyone can see by the videos, that these massive ordinance penetrating bombs did the job,” Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said. “I think their key facilities have been disabled, and I think Iran is now a long time away from doing what they might have done before this very successful operation.”
A preliminary report from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reached different conclusions, finding that the strikes set back Iran’s nuclear program by months, rather than years. More recent statements from the CIA and Trump’s head of national intelligence have disputed the DIA report, creating mixed messages from the administration about the success of the mission.
Welcome to The Hill’s Defense & National Security newsletter, I’m Ellen Mitchell — your guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond.
Iran “showed the world that the Israeli regime had NO Choice but to RUN to ‘Daddy’ to avoid being flattened out by our missiles,” wrote Seyeb Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s Foreign Minister, on X. This comes amid a back and forth between Iran and the U.S. after the supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei spoke for the first time since the U.S. strikes. “My congratulations on our dear Iran’s victory over the US regime,” …
The Senate blocked an effort Friday to prevent President Trump from taking future military action against Iran without authorization from Congress, less than a week after he directed strikes aimed at the country’s nuclear capabilities. Senators voted 47-53 largely along party lines against the war powers resolution. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) was the lone GOP lawmaker to vote with Democrats. Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), …
Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said Friday it’s “premature” for anyone to be claiming that Iran will not try to continue its nuclear program. “The Iranian regime had not made a decision to build a bomb, was not pursuing the mechanism of a bomb, even though it was enriching uranium,” he said in Friday comments on ABC News Live. Over the past week, there has been heavy debate over whether the U.S. strikes in Iran on June 21 …
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) took a swipe at President Trump’s national security team in a rare interview as part of a recent pattern of public comments urging the president to consider military intervention in Iran and elsewhere more favorably. “He’s got some pretty rabid isolationists over at [the Department of Defense] — you could argue the vice president is in that group,” the former Senate Republican leader told Politico. …
The Center for Strategic and International Studieswill hold a conversation on “What Do Strikes on Iran Mean for China, Russia, and North Korea?” at 3 p.m.
In Other News
Branch out with a different read from The Hill:
Senators diverge sharply on damage done by Iran strikes after classified briefing
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senators emerged from a classified briefing Thursday with sharply diverging assessments of President Donald Trump’s bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites, with Republicans calling the mission a clear success and Democrats expressing deep skepticism. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, …
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told Senate Republicans to expect to see the legislative text of the budget reconciliation package on Friday … Read more
President Trump’s approval rating is underwater and a majority of voters believe the country is on the wrong track, according to a poll released Friday. … Read more
Opinions in The Hill
Op-eds related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: